<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are you the Nanjing MG3?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/</link>
	<description>Explaining the Chinese Car Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:38:45 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philippeimac</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/comment-page-1/#comment-50458</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippeimac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/#comment-50458</guid>
		<description>The RDX60 project is different than the Rover drawing shown here. Recently a prototype in clay has been found in the plant of Londbridge. It has nothing to see with the Brillance A1 prototype shown here either. At least we only see the bodycoach and the lines and size have almost nothing in common.
It sounds clear to me that this article deals not with 1 but 3 cars: the real RDX60 totally absent here, the Rover drawing which is just a drawing and the Birllance A1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RDX60 project is different than the Rover drawing shown here. Recently a prototype in clay has been found in the plant of Londbridge. It has nothing to see with the Brillance A1 prototype shown here either. At least we only see the bodycoach and the lines and size have almost nothing in common.<br />
It sounds clear to me that this article deals not with 1 but 3 cars: the real RDX60 totally absent here, the Rover drawing which is just a drawing and the Birllance A1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.roewe.co.nr</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/comment-page-1/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>www.roewe.co.nr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>It certainly would be interesting if Nanjing started developing the RDX60, as we&#039;d have SAIC and Nanjing evolving the same project....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly would be interesting if Nanjing started developing the RDX60, as we&#8217;d have <a title="SAIC" href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/category/shanghai-automotive-industry-corporation">SAIC</a> and Nanjing evolving the same project&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/comment-page-1/#comment-1494</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/#comment-1494</guid>
		<description>I knew the image was a mock up - however, it was the one that most clearly showed the shared lines on the side of the car.

In my opinion its too much to be a coincidence!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew the image was a mock up &#8211; however, it was the one that most clearly showed the shared lines on the side of the car.</p>
<p>In my opinion its too much to be a coincidence!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.roewe.co.nr</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/comment-page-1/#comment-1490</link>
		<dc:creator>www.roewe.co.nr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/#comment-1490</guid>
		<description>&quot;MGR&#039;s stylists&#039; frustrations with RDX60 inactivity led to this &#039;leaked&#039; image being sent to the UK media. It was supposed to be a wake-up call...&quot;

Look at the rear wheel it&#039;s a photoshop, done rather quickly..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;MGR&#8217;s stylists&#8217; frustrations with RDX60 inactivity led to this &#8216;leaked&#8217; image being sent to the UK media. It was supposed to be a wake-up call&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Look at the rear wheel it&#8217;s a photoshop, done rather quickly..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/comment-page-1/#comment-1461</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/#comment-1461</guid>
		<description>http://www.austin-rover.co.uk/index.htm?rovrd60f.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.austin-rover.co.uk/index.htm?rovrd60f.htm"  target="_blank">http://www.austin-rover.co.uk/index.htm?rovrd60f.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.roewe.co.nr</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/comment-page-1/#comment-1458</link>
		<dc:creator>www.roewe.co.nr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 22:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/#comment-1458</guid>
		<description>Also that RDX60 picture you have is unlikely to be based on any real car, it&#039;s a pretty bad photoshop that apparentely resulted from the frustrations of MG-R staff at the MG-R management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also that RDX60 picture you have is unlikely to be based on any real car, it&#8217;s a pretty bad photoshop that apparentely resulted from the frustrations of <a title="MG" href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/category/nanjing-mg">MG</a>-R staff at the <a title="MG" href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/category/nanjing-mg">MG</a>-R management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/comment-page-1/#comment-1455</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>You should blame those fools at Sohu too:

http://news.sohu.com/20070316/n248776947.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should blame those fools at Sohu too:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.sohu.com/20070316/n248776947.shtml"  target="_blank">http://news.sohu.com/20070316/n248776947.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alibaba</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/comment-page-1/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>alibaba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 08:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/03/17/are-you-the-nanjing-mg3/#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>You are fooled, those comments in mgr forum only care about rover/mg or roewe, and with little knowledge on Chinese market. The car is obviously a Zhonghua A1, it&#039;s very different from rover25 series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are fooled, those comments in mgr forum only care about rover/mg or roewe, and with little knowledge on Chinese market. The car is obviously a Zhonghua A1, it&#8217;s very different from rover25 series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

