<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geely &#8216;Death Vessel&#8217;</title>
	<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/</link>
	<description>Explaining the Chinese Car Industry and Chinese Cars</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31431</link>
		<author>Ash</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31431</guid>
		<description>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/05/more-on-the-geely-death-vessel/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/05/more-on-the-geely-death-vessel/" rel="nofollow">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/05/more-on-the-geely-death-vessel/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mememe</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31420</link>
		<author>Mememe</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31420</guid>
		<description>I think this was tested at the C-Ncap at 50 kmph, I think there is an article at China car times here, it did quite ok in C-Ncap but now when it is put through a 64 kph test, it is a disaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this was tested at the C-Ncap at 50 kmph, I think there is an article at China car times here, it did quite ok in C-Ncap but now when it is put through a 64 kph test, it is a disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin G</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31413</link>
		<author>Colin G</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31413</guid>
		<description>Pushing the boundaries? It looks like they slightly tapped the boundary and the car fell apart!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pushing the boundaries? It looks like they slightly tapped the boundary and the car fell apart!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin G</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31411</link>
		<author>Colin G</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31411</guid>
		<description>How can a company knowingly put a car this bad onto the market?  Do they not test them themselves before releasing them on the poor unsuspecting public??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can a company knowingly put a car this bad onto the market?  Do they not test them themselves before releasing them on the poor unsuspecting public??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mememe</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31408</link>
		<author>Mememe</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31408</guid>
		<description>Is the video released yet ash ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the video released yet ash ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dog tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31357</link>
		<author>dog tucker</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31357</guid>
		<description>Yep -a new test regime and ratings being started now by a new body - eNCRAP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep -a new test regime and ratings being started now by a new body - eNCRAP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOHNSON</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31353</link>
		<author>JOHNSON</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31353</guid>
		<description>at least they are pushing the boundaries of the eNCAP ratings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at least they are pushing the boundaries of the eNCAP ratings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dog tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31345</link>
		<author>dog tucker</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31345</guid>
		<description>Its easy really-you buy and drive junk you gunna die!!! The peoples choice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its easy really-you buy and drive junk you gunna die!!! The peoples choice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mememe</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31328</link>
		<author>Mememe</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31328</guid>
		<description>From Geely Otaka to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Geely Otaka to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mememe</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31322</link>
		<author>Mememe</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31322</guid>
		<description>it seems like Geely is the only one that is not learning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it seems like Geely is the only one that is not learning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mememe</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31321</link>
		<author>Mememe</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31321</guid>
		<description>hahaha, another "giddy" success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha, another &#8220;giddy&#8221; success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragin</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31317</link>
		<author>dragin</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/02/04/geely-death-vessel/#comment-31317</guid>
		<description>This is an old platform that apparently is derived from the Daihatsu Charade that the original Xiali was built off of. 
Looking at the firewall (of the uncrashed vehicle) I always got the impression that it had been beaten into submission with a sledgehammer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an old platform that apparently is derived from the Daihatsu Charade that the original Xiali was built off of.<br />
Looking at the firewall (of the uncrashed vehicle) I always got the impression that it had been beaten into submission with a sledgehammer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
