<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NAC MG planning whole new MG5?</title>
	<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/07/nac-mg-planning-whole-new-mg5/</link>
	<description>Explaining the Chinese Car Industry and Chinese Cars</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: C240</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/07/nac-mg-planning-whole-new-mg5/#comment-48789</link>
		<author>C240</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/07/nac-mg-planning-whole-new-mg5/#comment-48789</guid>
		<description>More like honda have have got involved on the IP issue and stopped them from making it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More like honda have have got involved on the IP issue and stopped them from making it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andi</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/07/nac-mg-planning-whole-new-mg5/#comment-48222</link>
		<author>Andi</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/07/nac-mg-planning-whole-new-mg5/#comment-48222</guid>
		<description>Hang on the 45 is too old for the Chinese market but its ok to rerelease the 25 which (I think) is older!! The ZS was a much better looking MG too in my opinon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang on the 45 is too old for the Chinese market but its ok to rerelease the 25 which (I think) is older!! The ZS was a much better looking MG too in my opinon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windy</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/07/nac-mg-planning-whole-new-mg5/#comment-48159</link>
		<author>Windy</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/07/nac-mg-planning-whole-new-mg5/#comment-48159</guid>
		<description>The Rover 400 was not based on the Honda Civic, they were a joint development involving R&#38;D from both companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rover 400 was not based on the Honda Civic, they were a joint development involving R&amp;D from both companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/07/nac-mg-planning-whole-new-mg5/#comment-48130</link>
		<author>Brian</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 12:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/07/nac-mg-planning-whole-new-mg5/#comment-48130</guid>
		<description>Impeccable history.  Kudos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impeccable history.  Kudos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/07/nac-mg-planning-whole-new-mg5/#comment-48119</link>
		<author>Neil</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/07/nac-mg-planning-whole-new-mg5/#comment-48119</guid>
		<description>The Rover 45 was only a facelifted Rover 400, which was launched in 1995.
However the 400 used a platform (and most of the upper body, interior, electrical, fuel, HVAC systems, etc.) from the then-current UK-built Honda Civic, itself based on the 1992 Japan-market Honda Domani. This makes the platform the same age as the Citroën ZX platform. It also means that NAC-MG may have faced difficulties selling the car in export markets, due to the IPR for most of the car having been owned by Honda, not MG-Rover and therefore not NAC-MG or SAIC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rover 45 was only a facelifted Rover 400, which was launched in 1995.<br />
However the 400 used a platform (and most of the upper body, interior, electrical, fuel, HVAC systems, etc.) from the then-current UK-built Honda Civic, itself based on the 1992 Japan-market Honda Domani. This makes the platform the same age as the Citroën ZX platform. It also means that NAC-MG may have faced difficulties selling the car in export markets, due to the IPR for most of the car having been owned by Honda, not MG-Rover and therefore not NAC-MG or SAIC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/07/nac-mg-planning-whole-new-mg5/#comment-48078</link>
		<author>mark</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 06:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/07/nac-mg-planning-whole-new-mg5/#comment-48078</guid>
		<description>"The Rover 45 was launched in 1999, and is clearly showing its age in 2008" try telling that to Volkswagen and Citroen in China!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Rover 45 was launched in 1999, and is clearly showing its age in 2008&#8243; try telling that to Volkswagen and Citroen in China!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
