<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 70k for an excellent looking Geely</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/</link>
	<description>Explaining the Chinese Car Industry and Chinese Cars</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:39:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/comment-page-1/#comment-111167</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/#comment-111167</guid>
		<description>Spotted one today on the back of a transporter, they look really good. Now the competition is set

Brilliance FRV V&#039;s BYD F3R V&#039;s Chery A3 Hatch (when launched) V&#039;s Geely Vision Hatch

I think I&#039;d take the FRV, myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spotted one today on the back of a transporter, they look really good. Now the competition is set</p>
<p>Brilliance FRV V&#8217;s BYD F3R V&#8217;s Chery A3 Hatch (when launched) V&#8217;s Geely Vision Hatch</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d take the FRV, myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joninchina</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/comment-page-1/#comment-50928</link>
		<dc:creator>joninchina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 04:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/#comment-50928</guid>
		<description>Ash, your info on prices is ALMOST exactly right!!  62,800rmb for the 1.5 MT and 69,800rmb for the 1.5 AT version....DAMN good prices.  Here&#039;s the link -

http://www.pcauto.com.cn/qcbj/sz/xcrp/0806/663947.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ash, your info on prices is ALMOST exactly right!!  62,800rmb for the 1.5 MT and 69,800rmb for the 1.5 AT version&#8230;.DAMN good prices.  Here&#8217;s the link -</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcauto.com.cn/qcbj/sz/xcrp/0806/663947.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcauto.com.cn/qcbj/sz/xcrp/0806/663947.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joninchina</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/comment-page-1/#comment-50550</link>
		<dc:creator>joninchina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 02:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/#comment-50550</guid>
		<description>I must say it IS a nice looking car - and I&#039;ve seen it.  The official debut was at the Shenzhen auto show.....I was there last friday (6/6) and seeing it in person was a pleasant surprise.  DEFINITELY the best looking production Geely yet! The 5 door king kong has a more confident appearance than the 4 door version - NOT rounding out the back hatch (a la the Chery A3 or Ford Focus) area is a big reason I think.  The interior is virtually identical to the 4 door version, which is not a bad thing - the king kong interior has always been pleasing in my opinion.  The 5 door version also offers a 60/40 split rear seat....which is a first for Geely (I&#039;ve always been bothered by the fact that they never offered a split fold down rear seat in previous models like the Merrie or Haoxing).  Overall a very nice car - it&#039;s not up to the &quot;classy&quot; appearance of the Brilliance FRV BUT it is 10,000 rmb cheaper (compared to the price of the FRV 1.6AT).  Congrats Geely - hope this is a sign of better things to come!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say it IS a nice looking car &#8211; and I&#8217;ve seen it.  The official debut was at the Shenzhen auto show&#8230;..I was there last friday (6/6) and seeing it in person was a pleasant surprise.  DEFINITELY the best looking production Geely yet! The 5 door king kong has a more confident appearance than the 4 door version &#8211; NOT rounding out the back hatch (a la the Chery A3 or Ford Focus) area is a big reason I think.  The interior is virtually identical to the 4 door version, which is not a bad thing &#8211; the king kong interior has always been pleasing in my opinion.  The 5 door version also offers a 60/40 split rear seat&#8230;.which is a first for Geely (I&#8217;ve always been bothered by the fact that they never offered a split fold down rear seat in previous models like the Merrie or Haoxing).  Overall a very nice car &#8211; it&#8217;s not up to the &#8220;classy&#8221; appearance of the Brilliance FRV BUT it is 10,000 rmb cheaper (compared to the price of the FRV 1.6AT).  Congrats Geely &#8211; hope this is a sign of better things to come!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lol</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/comment-page-1/#comment-50037</link>
		<dc:creator>lol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 16:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/#comment-50037</guid>
		<description>look like a BMW reject. Geely is the most pathetic Chinese car maker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look like a BMW reject. Geely is the most pathetic Chinese car maker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aron</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/comment-page-1/#comment-50029</link>
		<dc:creator>aron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/#comment-50029</guid>
		<description>Rather good looking for 70k. Since it&#039;s a 1.5L, it sounds like the Toyota-licensed engine from the CK. Let&#039;s hope it&#039;s safer than the CK! Hm, and interestingly enough, I just found out Geely only started making cars in 1998! Impressive improvments in such a short time. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather good looking for 70k. Since it&#8217;s a 1.5L, it sounds like the Toyota-licensed engine from the CK. Let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s safer than the CK! Hm, and interestingly enough, I just found out Geely only started making cars in 1998! Impressive improvments in such a short time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragin</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/comment-page-1/#comment-50023</link>
		<dc:creator>dragin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/#comment-50023</guid>
		<description>I wonder whose technology went into the engine and automatic transmission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder whose technology went into the engine and automatic transmission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/comment-page-1/#comment-50016</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/2008/05/29/70k-for-an-excellent-looking-geely/#comment-50016</guid>
		<description>Ash - you mean you don&#039;t like the Beauty Leopard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ash &#8211; you mean you don&#8217;t like the Beauty Leopard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
