<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roewe 550 Sports &#8211; Getting better!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/17/roewe-550-sports-getting-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/17/roewe-550-sports-getting-better/</link>
	<description>Explaining the Chinese Car Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:38:45 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: I____H___at__e_C__h_i_na</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/17/roewe-550-sports-getting-better/comment-page-1/#comment-167824</link>
		<dc:creator>I____H___at__e_C__h_i_na</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=6067#comment-167824</guid>
		<description>&gt; Btw just in case you don’t know Roewe 550 is the product of the cooperation between SAIC and the British engineers, I don’t think Ssangyong or any Korean companies got anything to do with this.

Roewe 550/MG6 has nothing to do with Ssangyong indeed; Roewe 350/MG5 is a Ssangyong however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Btw just in case you don’t know <a title="Roewe" href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/category/roewe/">Roewe</a> 550 is the product of the cooperation between <a title="SAIC" href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/category/shanghai-automotive-industry-corporation">SAIC</a> and the British engineers, I don’t think <a title="Ssangyong" href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/category/ssangyong-china/">Ssangyong</a> or any Korean companies got anything to do with this.</p>
<p><a title="Roewe" href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/category/roewe/">Roewe</a> 550/MG6 has nothing to do with <a title="Ssangyong" href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/category/ssangyong-china/">Ssangyong</a> indeed; <a title="Roewe" href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/category/roewe/">Roewe</a> 350/MG5 is a <a title="Ssangyong" href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/category/ssangyong-china/">Ssangyong</a> however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mememe</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/17/roewe-550-sports-getting-better/comment-page-1/#comment-167751</link>
		<dc:creator>mememe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=6067#comment-167751</guid>
		<description>Hello ?? This is not a hybrid vehicle. 

The litigation mainly involves the hybrid tech, beside that Ssangyong (former korean company, who is theoretically belonged to SAIC now) trade union adamantly make a lot of claims. So far, nothing has been proven yet regarding to the hybrid tech leakage. 

Btw just in case you don&#039;t know Roewe 550 is the product of the cooperation between SAIC and the British engineers, I don&#039;t think Ssangyong or any Korean companies got anything to do with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello ?? This is not a hybrid vehicle. </p>
<p>The litigation mainly involves the hybrid tech, beside that <a title="Ssangyong" href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/category/ssangyong-china/">Ssangyong</a> (former korean company, who is theoretically belonged to <a title="SAIC" href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/category/shanghai-automotive-industry-corporation">SAIC</a> now) trade union adamantly make a lot of claims. So far, nothing has been proven yet regarding to the hybrid tech leakage. </p>
<p>Btw just in case you don&#8217;t know <a title="Roewe" href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/category/roewe/">Roewe</a> 550 is the product of the cooperation between <a title="SAIC" href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/category/shanghai-automotive-industry-corporation">SAIC</a> and the British engineers, I don&#8217;t think <a title="Ssangyong" href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/category/ssangyong-china/">Ssangyong</a> or any Korean companies got anything to do with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bm</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/17/roewe-550-sports-getting-better/comment-page-1/#comment-167723</link>
		<dc:creator>bm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=6067#comment-167723</guid>
		<description>nice, some where i heard that SM fucked korean company to steal all this technology...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice, some where i heard that SM fucked korean company to steal all this technology&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/17/roewe-550-sports-getting-better/comment-page-1/#comment-165905</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=6067#comment-165905</guid>
		<description>I quite like the colour. Looking good. Btw you realise this car will be on show at the Auto Show, don&#039;t you? Those pictures are taken at the exhibition centre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite like the colour. Looking good. Btw you realise this car will be on show at the Auto Show, don&#8217;t you? Those pictures are taken at the exhibition centre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

