<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geely GE aka the &#8216;Baby Rolls&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/20/geely-ge-aka-the-baby-rolls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/20/geely-ge-aka-the-baby-rolls/</link>
	<description>Explaining the Chinese Car Industry and Chinese Cars</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:30:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: david jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/20/geely-ge-aka-the-baby-rolls/comment-page-1/#comment-203746</link>
		<dc:creator>david jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=6211#comment-203746</guid>
		<description>great looking motor, from fotos one would confuse it with  a ridiculouly priced  and Im a RR owner Real Roller. -!  Real RR  were plainly never  worth their heavy price tag. 
As to RR suing ? Remember how they sued John Dodd with his beast. and that wasnt a copy, and argualy had a right to use the RR logo, it did have a RR engine albeit from an aircraft .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great looking motor, from fotos one would confuse it with  a ridiculouly priced  and Im a RR owner Real Roller. -!  Real RR  were plainly never  worth their heavy price tag.<br />
As to RR suing ? Remember how they sued John Dodd with his beast. and that wasnt a copy, and argualy had a right to use the RR logo, it did have a RR engine albeit from an aircraft .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Den</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/20/geely-ge-aka-the-baby-rolls/comment-page-1/#comment-173364</link>
		<dc:creator>Den</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 08:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=6211#comment-173364</guid>
		<description>nganying jah tuh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nganying jah tuh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MICHAEL BAUER</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/20/geely-ge-aka-the-baby-rolls/comment-page-1/#comment-172513</link>
		<dc:creator>MICHAEL BAUER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 16:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=6211#comment-172513</guid>
		<description>I think the Geely GE is an excellent looking LUXURY CAR from CHINA! Also I think that the &quot;Geely GE&quot; front end and GRILLE are even more impressive than the current ROLLS ROYCE! Is this car going to be available in the UNITED STATES ? If so when and how much will it cost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Geely GE is an excellent looking LUXURY CAR from CHINA! Also I think that the &#8220;Geely GE&#8221; front end and GRILLE are even more impressive than the current ROLLS ROYCE! Is this car going to be available in the UNITED STATES ? If so when and how much will it cost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bilal</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/20/geely-ge-aka-the-baby-rolls/comment-page-1/#comment-172461</link>
		<dc:creator>bilal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 12:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=6211#comment-172461</guid>
		<description>sir 
kindly tell me what is price of this car</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sir<br />
kindly tell me what is price of this car</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMcD</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/20/geely-ge-aka-the-baby-rolls/comment-page-1/#comment-167989</link>
		<dc:creator>DMcD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=6211#comment-167989</guid>
		<description>Mistake --- especially the &quot;throne&quot; for a (single) back seat. They might just sell 3 or 4 of these , f they&#039;re lucky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mistake &#8212; especially the &#8220;throne&#8221; for a (single) back seat. They might just sell 3 or 4 of these , f they&#8217;re lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mememe</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/20/geely-ge-aka-the-baby-rolls/comment-page-1/#comment-167917</link>
		<dc:creator>mememe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=6211#comment-167917</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s quite interesting that RR did not say anything about Chrysler 300c</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s quite interesting that RR did not say anything about Chrysler 300c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mememe</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/20/geely-ge-aka-the-baby-rolls/comment-page-1/#comment-167914</link>
		<dc:creator>mememe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=6211#comment-167914</guid>
		<description>Ye this car is a really bad move by Geely, just one bad apple spoil the whole basket, Geely will have to deal with this image of RR copy now for shanghai auto 2009. RR is considering a lawsuit now. I still don&#039;t understand why Geely spokesman at shanghai auto reiterated that it is not a copy, it is original work. 

Btw when did Hyundai Equus come into this  ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ye this car is a really bad move by Geely, just one bad apple spoil the whole basket, Geely will have to deal with this image of RR copy now for shanghai auto 2009. RR is considering a lawsuit now. I still don&#8217;t understand why Geely spokesman at shanghai auto reiterated that it is not a copy, it is original work. </p>
<p>Btw when did Hyundai Equus come into this  ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skyline</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/20/geely-ge-aka-the-baby-rolls/comment-page-1/#comment-167906</link>
		<dc:creator>skyline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=6211#comment-167906</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Geely GE has been known as the Baby Rolls Royce for quite some time in the Chinese press, and its presance at the Shanghai Auto Show impressed everyone..&quot;

Really? I believe the rest of the world is mocking this company for copying RR and the last generation Hyundai Equus. Please write an article that states the true fact. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Geely GE has been known as the Baby Rolls Royce for quite some time in the Chinese press, and its presance at the Shanghai Auto Show impressed everyone..&#8221;</p>
<p>Really? I believe the rest of the world is mocking this company for copying RR and the last generation Hyundai Equus. Please write an article that states the true fact. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackson liu</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/20/geely-ge-aka-the-baby-rolls/comment-page-1/#comment-167867</link>
		<dc:creator>jackson liu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=6211#comment-167867</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure this won&#039;t lead anywhere, and R.Roice will end loosing in Chinese courts, but it&#039;s still worth posting:

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/23/rolls-royce-considering-trademark-suit-against-geely-ge/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure this won&#8217;t lead anywhere, and R.Roice will end loosing in Chinese courts, but it&#8217;s still worth posting:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/23/rolls-royce-considering-trademark-suit-against-geely-ge/" rel="nofollow">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/23/rolls-royce-considering-trademark-suit-against-geely-ge/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill warren</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/04/20/geely-ge-aka-the-baby-rolls/comment-page-1/#comment-167717</link>
		<dc:creator>bill warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=6211#comment-167717</guid>
		<description>how much is this car?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how much is this car?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
