Home » Chinese Car News

CCT Changes!

24 June 2009 5 Comments

cct-newOur regular readers will have noticed that CCT has undergone a massive change. The change in design signifies a new path for CCT, moving away from just news delivery, and into more rich media content.

Over the next few weeks, you will see the following changes:

  • More News – Green news, interesting news, odd news
  • More Reviews – We’re planning to work with more car companies to test/review their cars.
  • More Pictures – This is something we’ve heard many complaints about before, we hope to add more pictures, larger galleries and video.
  • Car Database – We’re working (slowly) on a comprehensive database of Chinese cars, searchable by price, specification, and engines.
  • More User Input – We wish to gain more comments, more insight from our readers via the comment box and also through other methods.
  • CCTV – The name gives it away, but it is being planned.

If you have any questions/criticism/praise, please contact us, or let us know via the comment box.

1 Star - This article is pretty bad2 Stars - This article could be better3 Stars - pretty good article here4 Stars - I enjoyed this article!5 Stars - Wow! Great article guys! (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

RSS feed

5 Comments »

Comment by james
2009-06-24 18:43:19

way to go guys! the site looks truly international now!!

 
Comment by dogtucker Subscribed to comments via email
2009-06-25 08:33:14

Its way better than the last change!

 
Comment by Charlie
2009-06-25 12:06:36

Like the new look!

 
Comment by CCT
2009-08-13 01:22:27

Has anyone noticed that spelling has improved?

Comment by CCT
2009-08-14 03:55:41

and threaded comments are BACK!

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post