Home » Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation

Ssangyong says SAIC pilfered its drawers

13 November 2009 6 Comments

From the Korean Times

State prosecutors said Wednesday a controversial transfer of technology for gasoline-electric hybrid cars to the China-based Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC) from Ssangyong Motor in Korea, owned by SAIC, in 2006 violated laws banning the transfer of sensitive information.

The Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office indicted seven senior engineers at Ssangyong on charges of leaking technology essential to develop gasoline-electric hybrid cars.

The indictment is seen as acknowledging SAIC stole the technologies, but during a briefing the office said it had no plans to take legal action against the Chinese carmaker.

The Korean government provided nearly half of the funds used to develop the new technology between 2004 and 2008, the legal grounds the prosecution used to state that Ssangyong’s transfer of subsidized homegrown technologies was done without state permission.

In June 2004, Ssangyong Motor, the smallest automaker based in Korea, succeeded in developing the key “Hybrid Control Unit” (HCU) in cooperation with German company FEV.

HCU is a component that enhances energy efficiency in hybrid cars.

Amid a domestic car market downturn hitting the company, SAIC took over a 48.9-percent stake in Ssangyong for 590 billion won in January 2005, becoming the largest shareholder.

Facing difficulty in developing a similar part on its own, the Chinese company had allegedly pressured Ssangyong engineers involved in the development to share the technologies, using its status as major shareholder.

The seven accused succumbed and gave the technology to SAIC without state permission in July 2006, said the prosecutors.

“They received no financial favors in exchange,” the prosecution said in a statement.

The investigation into the alleged leak began in January 2007 after a tipoff from the National Intelligence Service.

At the beginning of the investigation, Ssangyong denied the allegation. The scandal also sparked controversy that SAIC took over the debt-ridden Korean company to “steal” expensive technologies Ssangyong had developed, and then threw the company away.

Anti-Chinese sentiment reignited after the company suspended its cash infusion into Ssangyong, partially contributing to the firm’s massive layoff of assembly workers earlier this year and the ensuing two-month-long bloody protest against management by fired workers at its main plant in Pyeongtaek, Gyeonggi Province.

Staying under bankruptcy protection, Ssangyong last week found its fine-tuned turnaround plan rejected by overseas creditors.

The final meeting determining whether the company will be revived will be held at the Seoul Central District Court on Dec. 11.

Hit by the protest, Ssangyong said it sustained 316 billion won in production losses. Ssangyong, whose product lineup is focused on sports utility vehicles (SUV), is reportedly negotiating with two or three foreigner investors for a possible sale.

1 Star - This article is pretty bad2 Stars - This article could be better3 Stars - pretty good article here4 Stars - I enjoyed this article!5 Stars - Wow! Great article guys! (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

RSS feed

6 Comments »

Comment by Alibaba
2009-11-13 23:17:53

Let Korean win what they want in Korea, just take it back in China. SAIC is too stupid to spend so much money on Ssanyong, they should totally focus on MG/Roewe’s future.

 
Comment by Windy
2009-11-14 05:08:30

A court case will get then nowhere, as one other article says “Industry sources say … that it would be better to use rather than attack one of China’s most promising automakers.”

Comment by I __ H a t e __ C h i n a
2009-11-16 12:42:32

@ Windy

> A court case will get then nowhere,

Here are the facts.

1. The tech taken by SAIC is “partial” and cannot complete a hybrid or PHEV drivetrain by itself. The battery pack tech was “black boxed” even to Ssangyong, and HCU unit can only interface with Korean battery packs. In other word, this HCU doesn’t work with BYD’s packs.

2. Accordingly, SAIC is trying to find a battery pack supplier in Korea that makes compatible battery packs.

3. Hyundai-Kia in particular feels that the government shouldn’t make a big deal of this issue since what SAIC is useless without access to matching compatible battery pack. A friction with Chinese government would impact their booming Chinese business. After all, the best selling car in China is a Hyundai.

 
 
Comment by Alibaba
2009-11-16 13:59:49

@IHC,
Don’t spread lies just for your KoreaVsChina troll.

-SAIC is trying to find a battery pack supplier in Korea that makes compatible battery packs.

SAIC’s partners on battery is A123 and Delphi.

-the best selling car in China is a Hyundai

Are you kidding?
October sales result: BYD F3 30008, it’s 13000 more than Hyndai Elantra.
Top selling companies are: FAW-VW 65791, SAIC-GM 63808, SAIC-VW 61064, Even BYD sells more than Hyundai.

Hyundai-Kia’s business model in China market is very similar with BYD/Chery/Geely, they sells car much cheaper and highly depended on compact models(A segment). Their price range are much lower than European/Japanese/American/SAIC-Roewe/FAW-Besturn.

 
Comment by FrugalOne
2009-11-18 18:50:38

I think the facts are quite clear….

SAIC management actually too time out and had a good look at the Ssanyong portfolio of cars…such as: http://lh4.ggpht.com/joemondello/RiDZIRZeawI/AAAAAAAAA3g/8_x4cypDBJk/s400/IMG_2782.JPG

then pulled out quick fast.

Best move they’ll ever make.

 
Comment by FrugalOne
2009-11-18 18:59:02

“October sales result: BYD F3 30008, it’s 13000 more than Hyndai Elantra.”

17000 is still a lot of these Elantra model bathtubs with wheels on the roads.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post