Car sales are up, so why is fuel use flat?
Excellent article from DNA India detailing how Chinese car sales might not appear to be all that they are:
China economy watchers have in recent weeks been puzzled by two seemingly irreconcilable pieces of statistics. Sales of motor vehicles are soaring: some 7.2 million passenger cars were sold during the nine months from January to September 2009, up 42% over the same period in 2008.
Monthly sales figures are even more spectacular: year-on-year sales growth in September was an astonishing 83%.
Yet, sales of petroleum and petroleum products — which should have risen in tandem with the car sales — have been far more subdued, and by some estimates flat.
Unable to account for this seeming inconsistency, some economists have remained sceptical about the authenticity of official Chinese statistics.“Chinese data, as always, need to be interpreted with some caution,” said Moody’s Economy.com economist Matt Robinson. “The stark divergence between vehicle sales growth and fuel sales growth suggests that a large number of cars are being sold but not driven — or at the very least, driven to a much lesser extent.”
Citing anecdotal evidence, Robinson reported that retail inventories were building up in China. “There have been reports of large fleets of new cars remaining idle in warehouses and holding yards, or in government vehicle car parks, as opposed to being sold to end users and driven.”
The theory went that in order to shore up the economy, the government had directed stated-owned enterprises and local government officials to buy up cars, in some cases using funds from the 4 trillion yuan stimulus package.
However, other economists reason that there might be other, “more reasonable” explanations for this statistical divergence. Standard Chartered economist Stephen Green is one of them. Green argues, firstly, that the headline car sales data overstates the growth in the total number of cars in China.
“We need to assume some retirement of old cars.” And when considering demand for fuel, it’s the growth in the total stock of cars, not just sales growth that matters. The passenger car stock will grow by some 24% y-o-y in 2009, which in percentage terms “is not as big as some of the headlines suggest.”
However, it’s rather more difficult to work out details of sales of China’s gasoline, which fuels all passenger cars and minibuses in China, given the absence of consolidated data.
Even the most authoritative industry newsletter, ‘China Oil, Gas and Petrochemicals’ has problems, notes Green.Likewise, numbers from the refiners themselves on sales of gasoline at the pump are “problematic”. But from what can be pieced together, the mystery remains unsolved: fuel sales growth does lag headline car sales growth.
Green then offers several explanations to account for this. He surmises that Chinese people are buying smaller, more fuel-efficient cars — and retiring bigger, less fuel-efficient cars. He said cars with engines of under 1.6 litres have enjoyed the fastest sales growth of all categories in 2009, helped by tax breaks for small cars.
They’re probably also travelling less — and driving their car less — because of slower income growth, particularly since gasoline is 20% more expensive than two years ago.
Additionally, the slowdown in freight traffic and in industrial activity since last year probably affected demand for fuel, he reasons.One additional factor, says Green, is that taxi fleets and other vehicles in cities and towns across China are converting to liquefied natural gas (LNG).Green concedes that it is “hard to come up with data to support all these points,” but points out the “complete absence of evidence” behind the assertion that all the cars are being bought up by government departments and state-owned companies.
“We are not averse to calling official data into question… but just being sceptical is not enough. Such claims have to be backed up by some evidence.” In this instance, he said, the hypothesis that the government and state-owned companies are buying all the cars does not amount to evidence, he adds.

Tweet This
Share on Facebook
Digg This
Save to delicious
Stumble it
RSS Feed


Another reason, cars were purchased (by individuals) but not necessarily driven.
OR, the Indians simply cannot accept that Chinese can afford more car than its citizens.
Maybe they are faking those big number F3 sales totals…. and they are really F3DMs
Ha HA, I agree with FrugalOne about the jealous Indians. India is a divided nation with 22 official languages, conflicting religions, and a caste system. They will take maybe a century to catch up with the west. Maybe 50 years to catch up with China.
On another note, since many Chinese car companies partner up with American and European companies like Volkswagen and General Motors, the increase in auto sales figures in China can easily be verified with these “reputable companies”.
It’s true about India. They are always saying how they’ve matched up to China when they are far far behind. And the Chinese don’t drive as much as the average Amercian. Plus, most of their cars have much smaller and more fuel efficient engines.
Haha, ok I can buy the China-envy theory…
But seriously, a lot of folks here end up not driving their cars to work because of the traffic.
Also, there are those (like me) who purchased a second car to get around traffic restrictions. ie- my net km’s driven didn’t change – they just got split between two cars. And in fact, my total gas consumption has gone down because my second car is more fuel-efficient.
Anyways, I don’t think they’re making up those sales figures. The increase in traffic over the past year here even with the restrictions is staggering.
Agreed. I live about 15 mins drive from QD University, I need to go there every morning by car as in the afternoons I need to get to the office which is quite far away. In 2005 it would take me 10 mins tops, now its 40 minutes. In 2015 the same trip will take me three days.
OK if the number just comes out from the Chinese authority then their doubt is not groundless but here Ford, Mercedes and other multinational car companies all report wonderful growth of sales in China. It’s hard for one individual to convince everyone when he/she claims something but when a lot of people say the same thing then that clears up the doubt.
Has anyone ever actually ‘retired’ a vehicle in China, apart from writing it off in an accident?