<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chang&#8217;an slows down North American entry, but still committed!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/11/24/changan-slows-down-north-american-entry-but-still-committed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/11/24/changan-slows-down-north-american-entry-but-still-committed/</link>
	<description>Explaining the Chinese Car Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:17:35 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragin</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/11/24/changan-slows-down-north-american-entry-but-still-committed/comment-page-1/#comment-217020</link>
		<dc:creator>dragin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=8775#comment-217020</guid>
		<description>Yes, only 7500 a year at start up, and 80% of these were slated for export. But I believe Tiger also continues to import from China, just don&#039;t know how many. 
They now have competition in the U.S. from DYMAC, Mag International, Zap, GreenGo Tek, and Hytric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, only 7500 a year at start up, and 80% of these were slated for export. But I believe Tiger also continues to import from China, just don&#8217;t know how many.<br />
They now have competition in the U.S. from DYMAC, Mag International, Zap, GreenGo Tek, and Hytric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCT</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/11/24/changan-slows-down-north-american-entry-but-still-committed/comment-page-1/#comment-216965</link>
		<dc:creator>CCT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=8775#comment-216965</guid>
		<description>Any idea what their yearly production is? I cant see their being a massive demand for a kei truck that cant reach much more 30mph in Oklahoma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea what their yearly production is? I cant see their being a massive demand for a kei truck that cant reach much more 30mph in Oklahoma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragin</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/11/24/changan-slows-down-north-american-entry-but-still-committed/comment-page-1/#comment-216957</link>
		<dc:creator>dragin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=8775#comment-216957</guid>
		<description>You are right CCT they are mostly classified as NEVs and can&#039;t be used on roads with speed limits exceeding 30mph(50kph). But last I heard Oklahoma was pushing legislation to allow them on all but expressways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right CCT they are mostly classified as NEVs and can&#8217;t be used on roads with speed limits exceeding 30mph(50kph). But last I heard Oklahoma was pushing legislation to allow them on all but expressways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCT</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/11/24/changan-slows-down-north-american-entry-but-still-committed/comment-page-1/#comment-216826</link>
		<dc:creator>CCT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=8775#comment-216826</guid>
		<description>Are they road legal? I remember someone telling me that they are mostly employed in factory grounds and warehouses due to their non road legal status, although this is likely to be incorrect information as the person telling me was Tiger trucks direct competitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are they road legal? I remember someone telling me that they are mostly employed in factory grounds and warehouses due to their non road legal status, although this is likely to be incorrect information as the person telling me was Tiger trucks direct competitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragin</title>
		<link>http://www.chinacartimes.com/2009/11/24/changan-slows-down-north-american-entry-but-still-committed/comment-page-1/#comment-216745</link>
		<dc:creator>dragin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinacartimes.com/?p=8775#comment-216745</guid>
		<description>What Reuters doesn&#039;t tell us is that the Poteau, Oklahoma plant keeps crankin out the Chang&#039;an Tiger trucks, for the feds and others. And that that apparently doesn&#039;t qualify as a foothold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Reuters doesn&#8217;t tell us is that the Poteau, Oklahoma plant keeps crankin out the Chang&#8217;an Tiger trucks, for the feds and others. And that that apparently doesn&#8217;t qualify as a foothold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

