Home » Brilliance/Zhonghua Auto, Headline

Brilliance signs up with booze maker to produce engines?

1 December 2009 21 Comments

The link up between Brilliance and Wu Liang Ye is quite possibly one of the more bizarre joint ventures in China (apart from the car made by a cellphone company) to date. Initial thoughts would be that Brilliance and Wu Liang Ye were planning to use some of Wu Liang Ye’s surplus crops to produce ethanol engines, but this is not the case.

On the 28th November the leaders of Liaoning Province and Sichuan Province were alongside the leaders of Brilliance Automotive and Wu Liang Ye as the first stone was laid in the building of new engine factory, which is a joint venture between Brilliance and Wu Liang Ye.

The factory will cover 612mu, and has investment of 1.8 billion RMB, and is set to produce diesel and gasoline engines for small trucks, small displacement car engines, cylinders, ECU systems and automatic gearboxes. The factory is not small scale, with an annual production of 500,000 engines.

Brilliance has plans to broaden its platforms and cars, which will range from 1.0L to 3.0L with power spread from 38kw to 130kw. Brilliance is planning to spread build new passenger cars (including SUV, and new mini sedan) and new MPV’s (The jinbei range will get a new pick up truck, light truck, and breadvan), which require their own engine range and will take Brilliance away from an over reliance on off the shelf Mitsubishi engines.

1 Star - This article is pretty bad2 Stars - This article could be better3 Stars - pretty good article here4 Stars - I enjoyed this article!5 Stars - Wow! Great article guys! (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

RSS feed

21 Comments »

Comment by lol
2009-12-02 02:05:00

rofl

 
Comment by menolikechina Subscribed to comments via email
2009-12-02 02:26:30

Great more crappy engines made by retards.

 
Comment by Ed
2009-12-02 04:37:36

Go Brilliance! Great news.

 
Comment by dogtucker Subscribed to comments via email
2009-12-02 09:49:25

A 3 litre at 130kw is hardly worth the effort. Wonder when the hell China is going to wake up to modern diesels!! Hardly great news at all Ed!! and not very ‘Brilliance’ either!

Comment by Ed
2009-12-03 04:39:46

the article made a mistake, it’s actually a 2.4l engine making 130kw, and China doesn’t need to, since their current focus is on electric and alternative fuel source engines.

 
 
Comment by Learners Test
2009-12-02 10:42:42

It’s not a bad looking car!

 
Comment by dogtucker Subscribed to comments via email
2009-12-03 08:32:12

“Doesnt need to”-what sort of arrogance is that?

Comment by Ed
2009-12-03 10:06:32

It’s the kind of attitude Americans lack and need. China is actually trying to protect the environment instead of driving 6.0l SUVs and fatass trucks when they clearly don’t have the need to. America is the one pointing their dirty fingers at others, while China knows what their main focus is, while protecting the environment at the same time. I suppose I’m the arrogant one??!

 
 
Comment by bitchmeansfemaledog Subscribed to comments via email
2009-12-03 08:46:42

Crappy engines!

 
Comment by bitchmeansfemaledog Subscribed to comments via email
2009-12-03 10:18:06

Not all Americans. You dumb retard!
You can’t say that crap. Ford just released new American eco-boost engines… Keep your Chinese garbage! Better off strapping two tonka trunks to my feet… safer

Comment by lol
2009-12-03 14:42:28

“Better off strapping two tonka trunks to my feet… safer”

Do that and take pictures then show us, we’ll believe it when we see it.

 
Comment by Ed
2009-12-04 05:03:44

That’s nothing compared to what Chinese automakers are doing. American failures…

 
 
Comment by dogtucker Subscribed to comments via email
2009-12-03 11:05:16

Wot are u talking about Ed??? Wot the hell is this about – diesel engines or some unnecessary jab at the poor downtrodden yankeeees!?
Plus Im not an americano so dont prejudge and also what utter crap is this – “while China knows what their main focus is, while protecting the environment at the same time”
And that last statement is the only thing right in your poorly judged reply “I suppose I’m the arrogant one??!”

 
Comment by Juls
2009-12-03 11:22:07

Irrelevant conversation. The whole eco-car thing is another marketing ploy at juicing the masses. China, after consideration of the honorable effort to reduce C02 emissions already stated, will still double its emissions by 2020. This is mostly industry related, so what car you drive doesnt matter much…

But am totally for it from a conscious consumer approach. Feels good to drive clean and it keeps your city and neighborhood clean.

Having said that, you got to give credit for the Chinese government’s full acceptance of the climate change issue and their reasonable approach in takling this problem. The same can not necessarily be said fo the US gov.

Comment by Barney
2009-12-03 12:25:46

I would happily drive an electric/hybrid car that doesnt look like crap.

Currently hybrids are in the realm of the weirdy-beardies with the Civic and the Pious, then you have the gigantic SUV’s that have hybrid systems for apparently zero reason.

When will a company produce a car/SUV that is hybrid, and is focused towards the average guy?

Comment by Juls
2009-12-03 13:31:30

I have one qualm with electric/hybrid:

The energy you will use to power your car ultimately depends on a primary power source. Say you drive an electric car in China, are you OK consuming electricity that is almost entirely produced from burning coal?

So you have a few choices:

electricity produced from fossil fuel power plants (either oil, coal, gaz etc) with varying degrees of pollution, the worst I guess being coal and the best being natural gaz.

electricity produced from nuclear fission power plants. There’s clearly different stances on that.

elctricity produced from renewable energy power plants (wind turbines, dams), with again varying degrees of impact on the environment… (i.e. fancy sucking power from the 3 gorges dam?)

That’s an alltogether different pickle, and I have no idea what’s worse in China: a combustion engine or a hybrid/full electric ultimately burning coal?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ed
2009-12-04 05:06:39

A majority of China’s electricity does NOT come from coal. Don’t talk blindly if you don’t know what you’re talking about.

 
 
 
 
Comment by dragin
2009-12-03 11:55:18

This Wuliangye-Brilliance tie-up is not news. Here’s a Shanghai Daily piece going back to mid-2006:

The alcohol giant (Wuliangye) announced last Tuesday (8/15/06) its subsidiary, China Push Group International Co Ltd, plans to spend 384 million yuan (US$48 million) for 46.5 percent of Xinhua Diesel Co Ltd, an affiliate of Brilliance Automobile Go Ltd. Xinhua would then be able to turn out 100,000 vehicles annually in addition to 500,000 units of engines, generating additional sales revenue of 8 billion yuan annually. Brilliance has set a target of an extra 10 billion yuan in sales by 2010 for Xinhua.

 
Comment by Shaun
2009-12-03 12:01:02

Nice looking car!

 
Comment by lol
2009-12-04 08:48:38

oh come on don’t take it out on the chinese fools, it’s not their fault that GM and Chrysler are like beggars now. are americans willing to buy GM and Chrysler cars ? oh silly me why need to ask that question, the bankuptcy and the bailout answer the questions already. the starving chinese are so mentally fucked up to keep on buying GM cars.

hey did i say everything right, bitch ?

 
Comment by dogtucker Subscribed to comments via email
2009-12-04 09:59:36

Who is this racist ass hole bitch thing?? Keep your ridiculous comments and foul tongue too yourself!
I think that you have got it wrong- currently the USA wouldnt exist along with its dying auto industry without China!
You sound like a typical stereotyped naive,ignorant big mouthed Americano rednecked pickup driver complete with a wife beater shirt and basketball cap back to front on your cro – magnon forehead. And no, Im not being racist-only factual.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post