This is a long story, so we are going to make it as short as possible. Back when MG-Rover was a solvent company it was looking to offload as much of its IPR without selling its core models IPR that was still on the market at the time, going through their portfolio it was found that they had the Austin Mastro platform which hit the market in the early 80‘s. MG-R figured it could get a good deal for that platform in the Far East or Eastern Europe, and they were right when Etsong, a Qingdao based tobacco company snapped it up in 1998. Etsong had seen other regional car manufacturers develop in nearby cities, Etsong clearly thought it was onto a winner when it produced the Maestro in Qingdao. The trouble was, they produced the Maestro in the year 2000 and there were much better cars on the market by then. Etsong quickly but quietly stopped making cars and sold the whole kit over to FAW who were more than happy to use the factory to continue building Maestros, until it sold the tooling and IPR to Sichuan Yema a couple of years ago. Sichuan Yema rolled out its own Maestro based cars, although they looked far too close to the last generation Forrester for comfort.
Now Yema is planning to use the same Maestro platform to produce an Audi A4 Avant Wagon clone according to these pictures, the Chinese media were keen to point out that the tiny firewall between the dashboard and the engine compartment is likely to help it fail a crash test in spectacular fashion, engine power is currently unknown but it does not look to be a Mitsubishi engine, in fact it looks closer to being a Geely engine but this is unlikely.
Just as things were looking up for the Chinese car industry as a whole with regards to independent designs being used, someone has to come along and start the whole cloned cars thing off once again.








The Maestro had a great chassis; well designed and built by Austin in England so there’s probably plenty of scope for further development left in it
Known for its good ride/handling capabilities and reputed to be much stronger and more rigid than later Honda based designs used by Austin-Rover for 200 series. The Austin Maestro chassis would probably easily pass C-NCAP testing too
The Maestro platform would not pass any modern safety test, though the suspension was rather good – the rear was used on the mid 90′s to 2005 Rover 200/25 despite their Honda origins.
There’s a difference between passing it with 1 star, and 5 stars!
Today’s C-NCAP is almost identical to the European equivalent. That means a C-NCAP 5 star car should also score 5 stars in the Euro NCAP. Would anyone put an Austin Maestro through today’s Euro NCAP? No I didn’t think so.
Awesome clone!
If true, they are going to sell a ton of these as owners will just replace the Yema emblems/badging with Audi.
The blog was great and yes, of course very interesting as well. The Austin Maestro is a good car and they are quite reliable on the road. If they are going to make it with the Maestro platform, the car is going to be amazing. If Yema is going to clone with the Audi A4 wow!!!!! This would be great I think….
Amazing? The Maestro is a turd even by the standards of the smallest and crappiest Chinese car makers!
You obviously never owned one. Have you ever even driven one?
We’re not talking about what it was like when new, we’re talking about what it’s like today when compared with contemporary engineering. If the Maestro platform was as good as some are implying then it would still be being produced in the hundreds of thousands in Europe alongside current the Focus, Golf and Astra, rather than in the dozens by one of China’s smallest car makers. No amount of nostalgia can change the fact that the Maestro is 30 years old, which in crash performance and handling terms might as well be a Model T Ford.
The Maestro platform could be developed to allow pretty decent handling and ride even by todays standard. Although most small cars have now gone over to a multi link rear end nearly all superminis still use the layout pioneered by the Golf 1, GM Astra 1 and of coure Maestro.
Crash safety of course is a completely different ball game
JON
this company obviously did not use their brains here, originality is impossible to find here, there are so many copy cat chinese car companies that disgusts me out. these companies must fail. i can bet you that these cars cant even compared to original cars from audi on its quality also. u get what u pay for
If some one wishes to be updated with latest technologies then
he must be pay a quick visit this web page and be up to date every day.