State Owned Manufacturers Are The Problem


This article by Auto News China’s Yang Jian brings quite the argument to the privatization of China’s biggest state owned manufacturers, he correctly asserts that the companies biggest weakness is the fact that they are state owned either at the local or provincial level which makes them more keen to listen to government policy rather than market requirements, also factor in company leaders are usually grandfathered in from elsewhere in the government apparatus and are largely not automotive people.

What’s wrong with Chinese automakers?

Chinese brands are losing market share in the world’s largest auto market.

In the first 11 months of 2011, Chinese brands’ light-vehicle sales dropped 3% year on year, even though industry sales rose 5%.

Their performance contrasts with double-digit sales growth in China by European, American and Korean brands.

“What is more worrisome is this situation (for the domestic brands) will most likely get worse, not better, over the next few years,” lamented Dong Yang, secretary general of the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, last week in an open letter.

Mr. Dong and others blame the domestic brands’ weak sales on poor brand images. But the underlying problem is state ownership.

China’s government considers auto manufacturing a pillar industry — too important to privatize. So when China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, Beijing retained its state-owned automakers.

The government also required foreign automakers to form joint ventures with state-owned Chinese companies if they want to produce in China. By doing so, the government hoped state-owned companies would learn from the global brands.

But these protective policies have done more harm than good to domestic automakers.

Now that nearly all global automakers do business here, China’s auto industry has become highly competitive. To prosper in such a market, a company must be responsive to customer needs and nimble in operations. But state-owned automakers have three deep-rooted weaknesses.

 

  1. They are more willing to listen to the government than to customers.

 

  1. Supported by government-backed loans and lacking rigorous accountability, they have an incurable desire for reckless expansion.

 

  1. The largest state-owned automakers rely heavily on the profits and sales of their joint ventures in China with foreign automakers. Without that crutch, they would be lost.

Few state-owned automakers have developed respectable domestic brands. As a result, their profits plunged last year after the government ended sales subsidies for small cars. Now, they must clean up their mistakes. For example, Chery Automobile Co. is losing money because it introduced too many models too quickly.

How should those state-owned players be revived?

The government is urging foreign automakers to create new brands for their joint ventures, supposedly giving the state-owned Chinese partners opportunities to learn.

Will this plan work? I don’t think so because of the weaknesses noted above. To reform state-owned automakers, the government should look to private domestic automakers for inspiration.

Take Great Wall Motor Co. and Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co. The two private Chinese automakers did not start making cars until the late 1990s. These latecomers started with inexpensive products, then began to move upscale. In the first 11 months of 2011, Great Wall’s sales surged 31%, according to LMC Automotive. Meanwhile, Geely’s sales rose 7%, not bad for such a difficult year. Now these companies are competing overseas.

Private Chinese automakers also make mistakes. Consider the plight of BYD Co. Sales crashed last year after the company over-expanded its dealership network.

But BYD is quicker to learn from its mistakes than a state-owned automaker such as Chery. BYD has cut back on its distribution network and is now focusing on launching upscale models. By contrast, Chery kept rolling out too many models since it began building vehicles in 1999 and is now stuck in a financial quagmire.

From the examples of Great Wall, Geely and BYD, Beijing should learn that the best way to revitalize state-owned automakers is through privatization.

As the global brands expand into China’s inland markets, the domestic automakers will be forced to compete. If the government really cares about the domestic automakers’ welfare, it should privatize them — and do it soon.

ash 010 web avatar State Owned Manufacturers Are The Problem

Ash

Ash came to China at 18 on a whim and never left. Some 10 years later he collected a degree and a family along the way and now focuses his time on watching the Chinese car industry develop. He has witnessed the market change from being minor backyard market in to the world's biggest and most important market for all car manufacturers. You can contact or connect with him via Linkedin by clicking the 'Website' link.

More Posts - Website

6 Comments so far, please add your thoughts!

  1. avatar mspirit says:

    In conclusion, based on the text, the problem is not government but rather the quality of the persons involved in the government and they lack of experience and reactivity to the market in order to make the right decisions. Don’t want to listen to the political moron? Then how would you feel about ignorant shareholders taking the lead of your company for short time profit?

    The truth is that there is no perfect system if you consider that China is not a Democracy. If the state is incompetent shouldn’t you be able to interact with it? Hell no! Just privatize the damn thing and let’s keep the established power in order for them to make other moronic decisions in other sectors.

    Understand that I’m just using the words of the commentator because in my opinion, if you think about state-owned brand, they could have done far worst. The comparison with Chinese private companies seems to rely on a rather weak conclusion and I believe they will need a more convincing argument in order to gain full access to the money pot.

  2. avatar Ian COKESTAR says:

    I do agree with mspirit. Public owned companies are very efficient if they are ruled by the right persons. For long term research projects, that’s a true advantages on private companies.

  3. avatar Analyst says:

    The Chinese auto industry has many problems, but I would probably place the state owned manufacturers near the top of the list – if not on the very top. Good read.

  4. avatar James says:

    The same for both foreign and Chinese companies: un-qualified persons, which is the root for all, and will be true for ever.

  5. avatar Momo says:

    This is not limited to China and the automotive industry. In the vast majority of cases, private-owned companies outperform their state-owned competitors, as the latter generally have other goals than answering their customers’ needs.

  6. avatar Shanghai61 says:

    It should happen, but it probably won’t …

    The car industry is seen as a strategic industry for China. Because of this, the Government will keep its SOE holdings intact. They allowed in the international makers in order for the local industry to learn and modernise, then take over.

    This model worked in the internet industry, which is viewed as equally important in terms of strategic control, and where local ‘clones’ of (banned) major global players hold the dominant shares in all the key areas.

    But it hasn’t worked in the auto industry, where the international brands not only hold the lion’s share, but are actually still growing their total share at the expense of the local brands.

    It’s probably not going to work in the long-term either, unless the SOEs can invest in their own R&D and start to produce competitive cars, rather than relying on re-skinned ‘discount’ versions of old JV platforms.

    What the Government plan (coming from a mindset of central planning and controlled markets) doesn’t take into account is that the customer has a choice, and votes with their wallets. The customer sees international brands as offering higher quality, safety, technology, and hence being better value for money than the local ‘clones’. What the Ministry wants to happen and what the car buyer wants to drive are two different things.

Why not leave a Reply?

Close
Sign up today to receive China Car Times weekly newsletter!
Your name
Your email